Posted by Mazeformer on
URL: https://mikraite.arkian.net/The-Argument-Against-Arguments-tp2920p4957.html

 There's not proof that Modern culture is dysgenic or anti-intellectual, in fact it is highly intellectual that it is super annoying. "It makes people both stupid through genetic decline and through an education system designed to dumb down the population." So you mean not having debates would reverse this? Sharing of thought through discourse even with ad hominem still is more productive for discussions around the world. Dr. Lichtman Bon had said that with a discourse of both ad hominising and throughout a form of re-rehabilitation of thought through pressure, meaning to form a consensus that both idea and discourse are both helping each other evolve through series of debate, meaning debate of this theory in question, a very useful thing for a societal matter when applying Lichtman's idea of discourse and societal appliance. "What are the practical implications of this? Don't argue politics or religion with the general population because they will be too stupid to understand what you are saying" Very basic and untouched yet uninformed position to make for someone who doesn't make their own argument against argument's page coherent in the intellectual sense. I understand you probably had this shower thought at the age of 14 and it stuck with you because you wanted to be deep, but it doesn't make any sense. You have not provided any way to really improve or "raise intelligence" because in reality you are not intelligent enough to even make a generational genetic model to rehabilitate the causal principles for human intelligence for the ability of discourse. If we were to remove debate, argumentation or discourse, there will be no improvement of religion and such. The reality is that in debate, untouched ideologies fall apart. Causality form in principle and the quiddity of such can be applied towards communism, Islam or metaphysical deistic models of subjective illogicalism.

"Arkian Project"... Please... Delete this comment and don't ever make an argument for what you have said ever again.

"Best you can do is to associate with some religion that ins't too bad and try to prevent it from decaying", a very agnostic view shared by intellectually scared and puny people who couldn't provide an argument when questioned on their belief. I think the main reality for this post is that you are coping with the fact that you are unable to hold a intellectual debate for a long time, either because of your attention span or the fact that you are unequivocally just a redditor from r/deepthoughts but was banned from there because you brought this terrible thought model to here. I can debunk you again and again if you want to make "arguments" against what I have said.