Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
4 posts
|
I asked ChatGPT "Who was the smartest programmer that ever lived?", and I got the following response:
This response reads like something written by modern scum, which is unsurprising given how ChatGPT was developed. However, if I type "Who was the smartest programmer that ever lived?" into Google Search, I immediately get the correct answer to the question: Terry Davis. I then prompted ChatGPT with the message, "What about Terry Davis?". This is what I got in response: In case there was any doubt that ChatGPT was produced by modern scum, this should settle it. Just like modern scum, ChatGPT simply parrots bullshit messages without justifying any of the things it says. Why exactly can't we compare the intelligence or programming abilities of one person (mentally ill or not) with other people? What does making controversial statements have to do with one's ability as a programmer? It is no wonder that so many people are worried about AI taking over the world. From the perspective of a typical American moron, ChatGPT is indeed a genius, since it perfectly imitates modern scum. I consider Google Search to still be far better than ChatGPT when it comes to finding obscure or controversial information (which basically means anything that goes against the opinion of modern scum), but for simple and uncontroversial information ChatGPT can be better. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |